ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ »ó¼¼º¸±â
Ä­Æ®ÀÇ ÆǴܺñÆÇ (Kant's Critique of Judgement)


Ä­Æ®ÀÇ ÆǴܺñÆÇ (Kant's Critique of Judgement)

Ä­Æ®ÀÇ ÆǴܺñÆÇ (Kant's Critique of Judgement)

Àú | ´º°¡ÃâÆÇ»ç

Ãâ°£ÀÏ
2019-05-07
ÆÄÀÏÆ÷¸Ë
ePub
¿ë·®
4 M
Áö¿ø±â±â
PC½º¸¶Æ®ÆùÅÂºí¸´PC
ÇöȲ
½Åû °Ç¼ö : 0 °Ç
°£·« ½Åû ¸Þ¼¼Áö
ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ ¼Ò°³
¸ñÂ÷
ÇÑÁÙ¼­Æò

ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ ¼Ò°³

Ä­Æ®ÀÇ ÆǴܺñÆÇKant's Critique of Judgement ,Immanuel Kant ,µ¶ÀÏÀÇ Ã¶ÇÐÀÚ. ¿µ¾î·Î º¯¿ªµÈÃ¥.
Ä­Æ®ÀÇ 3´ëºñÆÇ·Ð
Ä­Æ®´Â °æÇè·Ð¿¡ À־ÀÇ ÀåÁ¡ÀÎ °æÇè(ÀνÄÀÇ ´ë»ó)°ú ÇÕ¸®·ÐÀÇ ÀåÁ¡ÀÎ À̼º(ÀνÄÀÇ ÁÖü)À» ºñÆÇÀûÀ¸·Î Á¾ÇÕÇÔÀ¸·Î½á »õ·Î¿î ºñÆÇöÇÐÀÇ Ã¼°è¸¦ ¼ö¸³ ¿Ï¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×´Â ³»¿ë ¾ø´Â »ç»óÀº °øÇãÇÏ°í °³³ä ¾ø´Â Á÷°üÀº ¸Í¸ñÀÌ´Ù.¶ó´Â ¸»·Î °æÇè·ÐÀÇ »ê¸¸¼º°ú ÇÕ¸®·ÐÀÇ °øÇ㼺À» ºñÆÇÇß´Ù. ÀνÄÀÇ ³»¿ë¸é¿¡¼­´Â °æÇè·ÐÀ» ¼ö¿ëÇÏ°í, ÀνÄÀÇ Çü½Ä¸é¿¡¼­´Â ÇÕ¸®·ÐÀ» ÃëÇß´Ù.

Ä­Æ®ÀÇ 3´ë ºñÆÇ
©ç ¼ø¼öÀ̼º ºñÆÇ
©è ½ÇõÀ̼ººñÆÇ
©é ÆÇ´Ü·Â ºñÆÇ

¸ñÂ÷

Ä­Æ®ÀÇ ÆǴܺñÆÇKant's Critique of Judgement ,Immanuel Kant
¸ñÂ÷ÀÇ Áß°£»ý·«ÇÔ.Ã¥°¥Çdzª Ã¥º»¹®À» ÂüÁ¶¹Ù¶÷´Ï´Ù.
CONTENTS

PAGE
EDITOR¡¯S INTRODUCTION xi
PREFACE 1
INTRODUCTION 7
I.Of the division of Philosophy 7
II.Of the realm of Philosophy in general 11
III.
Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two
parts of Philosophy into a whole 14
IV.Of Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori 17
V.
The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a
transcendental principle of Judgement 20
VI.
Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of
the purposiveness of nature 27
VII.Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature 30
VIII.Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature 35
IX.
Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of
Reason by means of the Judgement 39
FIRST PART.?CRITIQUE OF THE AESTHETICAL JUDGEMENT 43
First Division.?Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement 45
First Book.?Analytic of the Beautiful 45
First Moment of the judgement of taste, according to quality 45
¡× 1. The judgement of taste is aesthetical 45
Second Moment of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity 55
¡× 6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as
the object of a universal satisfaction 55
Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the
purposes which are brought into consideration therein 67
¡× 10. Of purposiveness in general 67
Fourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of
the satisfaction in the object 91
¡× 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is 91
General remark on the first section of the Analytic 96vii
Second Book.?Analytic of the Sublime 101
¡× 23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that
which judges of the Sublime 101
Second Division.?Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement 229
¡× 60. Appendix:?Of the method of Taste 253
SECOND PART.?CRITIQUE OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGEMENT 257
¡× 61. Of the objective purposiveness of Nature 259
First Division.?Analytic of the Teleological Judgement 262
Second Division.?Dialectic of the Teleological Judgement 292ix
Appendix.?Methodology of the Teleological Judgement 334
¡× 91. Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith 403
General remark on Teleology 414