ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ »ó¼¼º¸±â
Áö½ÄÀÇ Ä­Æ®ÀÌ·Ð (KANT'S THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE,by H. A. PRICHARD)


Áö½ÄÀÇ Ä­Æ®ÀÌ·Ð (KANT'S THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE,by H. A. PRICHARD)

Áö½ÄÀÇ Ä­Æ®ÀÌ·Ð (KANT'S THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE,by H. A. PRICHARD)

< HA.PRICHARD> Àú | ´º°¡ÃâÆÇ»ç

Ãâ°£ÀÏ
2019-06-20
ÆÄÀÏÆ÷¸Ë
ePub
¿ë·®
1 M
Áö¿ø±â±â
PC½º¸¶Æ®ÆùÅÂºí¸´PC
ÇöȲ
½Åû °Ç¼ö : 0 °Ç
°£·« ½Åû ¸Þ¼¼Áö
ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ ¼Ò°³
¸ñÂ÷
ÇÑÁÙ¼­Æò

ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ ¼Ò°³

Ã¥¼­¾ð. Ä­Æ®ÀÇ Ã¥ÀÎ »ï´ëºñÆǵîÀ» ºÐ¼®Çؼ­ Áö½Ä¿¡´ëÇؼ­ Ä­Æ®ÀÌ·ÐÀ» ¾¸.
PREFACE
This book is an attempt to think out the nature and tenability of Kant's
Transcendental Idealism, an attempt animated by the conviction that even the
elucidation of Kant's meaning, apart from any criticism, is impossible without a
discussion on their own merits of the main issues which he raises.
My obligations are many and great: to Caird's Critical Philosophy of Kant and to
the translations of Meiklejohn, Max M£¿ller, and Professor Mahaffy; to Mr. J. A.
Smith, Fellow of Balliol College, and to Mr. H. W. B. Joseph, Fellow of New
College, for what I have learned from them in discussion; to Mr. A. J. Jenkinson,
Fellow of Brasenose College, for reading and commenting on the first half of
the MS.; to Mr. H. H. Joachim, Fellow of Merton College, for making many
important suggestions, especially with regard to matters of translation; to Mr.
Joseph, for reading the whole of the proofs and for making many valuable
corrections; and, above all, to my wife for constant and unfailing help
throughout, and to Professor Cook Wilson, to have been whose pupil I count
the greatest of philosophical good fortunes. Some years ago it was my privilege
to be a member of a class with which Professor Cook Wilson read a portion of
Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, and subsequently I have had the advantage of
discussing with him several of the more important passages. I am especially [Pg
iv] indebted to him in my discussion of the following topics: the distinction
between the Sensibility and the Understanding (pp. 27-31, 146-9, 162-6), the
term 'form of perception' (pp. 37, 40, 133 fin.-135), the Metaphysical
Exposition of Space (pp. 41-8), Inner Sense (Ch. V, and pp. 138-9), the
Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories (pp. 149-53), Kant's account of 'the
reference of representations to an object' (pp. 178-86), an implication of
perspective (p. 90), the impossibility of a 'theory' of knowledge (p. 245), and
the points considered, pp. 200 med.-202 med., 214 med.-215 med., and 218.
The views expressed in the pages referred to originated from Professor Cook
Wilson, though it must not be assumed that he would accept them in the form
in which they are there stated.

¸ñÂ÷

CONTENTS

PAGE
CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM OF THE Critique 1
CHAPTER II
THE SENSIBILITY AND THE UNDERSTANDING 27
CHAPTER III
SPACE 36
CHAPTER IV
PHENOMENA AND THINGS IN THEMSELVES 71
NOTE
THE FIRST ANTINOMY 101
CHAPTER V
TIME AND INNER SENSE 103
CHAPTER VI
KNOWLEDGE AND REALITY 115
CHAPTER VII
THE METAPHYSICAL DEDUCTION OF THE CATEGORIES 140
CHAPTER VIII
THE TRANSCENDENTAL DEDUCTION OF THE CATEGORIES 161
CHAPTER IX
GENERAL CRITICISM OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL DEDUCTION OF THE CATEGORIES 214
CHAPTER X[Pg vi]
THE SCHEMATISM OF THE CATEGORIES 246
CHAPTER XI
THE MATHEMATICAL PRINCIPLES 260
CHAPTER XII

THE ANALOGIES OF EXPERIENCE 268
CHAPTER XIII
THE POSTULATES OF EMPIRICAL THOUGHT 308
NOTE
THE REFUTATION OF IDEALISM 319