I wrote two papers in June 2016. One paper showed that the big bang theory is wrong in various aspects, the other showed that the time difference between a satellite and ground cannot be the evidence of special relativity. I guessed the probability of these papers being adopted in the journals was about 10%. How can such papers be adopted so easily? I knew well what the world was like.

The next two papers were written in December 2016. One is about Michelson-Morley’s experiment that led to the principle of invariant light speed, the other is about time dilation and length contraction. These papers have already been written in 1980. They became easier and logically clearer than then. After writing these papers at that time, I felt that I should not do this research. I never looked again at relativity theory, and the idea was right.

In March 2017, I found that the space around mass doesn’t change in θ, ф directions in general relativity. Of course, in the real space this is a contradiction. In September of that year, I revealed that the precession of Mercury’s perihelion and light bending cannot be the evidences of general relativity.

These papers seemed enough, but there were more to do. In February 2019, I revealed that RT=To in the big bang theory and Lorentz transformation, the core of special relativity, are wrong. In March, I showed that the equation between mass and speed is impossible and mass cannot be energy. In April, I showed that the gravitational wave measurement results did not prove the gravitational wave. I added them to the previous papers. In July, I tied them up and submitted them to the journals under the title "Problems in relativity and big bang theories”.

In September 2019, I revealed that the principle of relativity was misapplied in Lorentz transformation and that the principle of invariant light speed cannot be induced from Michelson-Morley’s experiment. In addition, I revealed that the principle of equivalence wa

The world is like that
Eventually the truth will win
How much have the mails been read?
Mails to non-physicists(5)
Mails to physicists(13)
Problems in the expansion of space
Time dilation in the rotating frame when the radius becomes infinite
Discrepancy between Bradley experiment and Michelson-Morley experiment
Fault in the development of time dilation and length contraction in th
Does the gravitational potential really change time and space?
Faults in the precession of Mercury’s perihelion and light bending in
The principles of relativity theory
A new understanding of the redshift of starlight